1) Nobody plays “total football” any more, so please stop referring to it unless you are providing helpful historical context. Even if you call it Totaalvoetbal, teams would get slaughtered if they tried it against modern tactical sides.
2) The current Dutch team aren’t the “heirs” of anything except perhaps the drills created and overseen by coaches and trainers at Ajax’s football academy.
3) I love Wesley Sneijder, but he has been amazingly lucky in this World Cup.
4) If Dirk Kuyt could run faster than my mother, he might well be the best player in the world.
5) Nobody has said anything about this World Cup smarter than Jonathan Wilson’s comment that “Formations are one thing, their employment something else.” What matters is not how the players are deployed on the whiteboard, but how they deploy themselves in conditions of stress or opportunity.
6) Much has been made, in some quarters, of the passing accuracy of the Spanish midfielders, especially Xavi and Xabi Alonso (and in the Germany match Busquets). And it is remarkable, and worthy of praise. But here’s the key thing: in the Spanish offense there’s always someone to pass to. You can’t have a high percentage of completions if you’re regularly trying to pass to tightly marked teammates.
7) Thus the key stat about Xavi in the Germany match was not his high number of passages and high completion percentage, but the fact that he ran farther than any other player: he continually moves to open spots on the pitch to receive passes—and his teammates do the same.
8 ) It’s this circulatory movement that makes Spain so efficient; but while the constant weaving and unweaving is mesmerizing to some, it is boring and frustrating to others. But the way Spain plays bears no resemblance to Coldplay’s music, okay? Random associations of things you vaguely dislike do not rise to the dignity of metaphor.
9) Spain always plays the ball to the open spot on the pitch; if the open spot on the pitch is not close to the goal, then alas. They just don’t make chancy passes: the low-percentage opportunity, seized in a moment of insightful ambition (if it works) or thoughtlessness (if it doesn’t). Sooner or later, the Spanish players think, space will open in a position from which we can attack, and when that happens we’ll be clinical.
10) But of course against well-organized defenses that opening will indeed happen later rather than sooner, which accounts for the Spanish scorelines: 0-1, 2-0, 2-1, 1-0, 1-0, 1-0 (with the goals in those last three matches scored at the 62nd, 82nd, and 72nd minutes respectively).
11) Meanwhile, as long as Spain have the ball . . . you know where I’m going with this. Possession percentages in Spain’s matches: 67%, 66%, 59%, 62%, 62%, 61%. Chile has been the only team to hold the ball more than 39% of the time.
12) All this said, the Dutch don’t need as many chances as most teams do: one moment of individual brilliance from Sneijder or Kuyt or Robben or Van Persie (who looked good, for once, against Uruguay) or even van Bronckhorst can disrupt the Spanish plan. If they get behind, the Spaniards will almost certainly maintain their patience—but that might work against them as time wears on.
13) The prediction, then: a relatively early (first half-hour) goal from Robben; Spanish tiki-taka for much of the next hour; finally, when Spain begins to push harder than usual, a counter-attack and another Dutch goal. Spain will pull one back late, but in the end the Dutch will win 2-1, and Spain’s chief consolation and frustration will be its highest possession percentage of the tournament.
Read More: Netherlands, Spain, World Cup
by Alan Jacobs · July 9, 2010
I hope your prediction is right. Sick and tired of seeing tika-taka for 90 minutes and listening to people praise it.
One more thing, thank God for Mourinho.
I’m far, far less tired of Spanish tiki-taka than teams deciding the right way to play against it is to stand around watching it happen and hoping they can counter when–if–Spain finally makes a poor pass. Why should Spain risk giving the ball up when their opponents aren’t willing to risk putting fewer than eight guys behind the ball? The one team willing to die with their shooting boots on against Spain has been Chile, and little wonder the first 30-40 minutes of that match was the most exciting, interesting soccer involving Spain the entire tournament. The fault, dear Portugal, Germany, Paraguay, lies not in the Spanish stars but in yourselves.
“But here’s the key thing: in the Spanish offense there’s always someone to pass to. You can’t have a high percentage of completions if you’re regularly trying to pass to tightly marked teammates.”
Xavi deserves credit for making this system conform to his strengths. FCB and Spain may have always been about possession football, but Xavi has taken that idea to the next logical step. He has forced managers to adjust their tactics to his particular strength: always finding the pass that best mixes possession with danger. He may look like a footballing equivalent of an insurance adjuster on TV, but his ability to measure risk at the pace of modern football is dizzying to me. Instead of an example of a “system making a player” Spain and FCB are systems made by the player. Not coincidently, those are usually the tactics that work best.
I don’t think the stats show that they are running alot when in possession. Manifestly, it looks boring partly because it looks like they aren’t running around so much. All that running, I think, is coming in the form of the pressing they do when out of possession.
Stats reality check: Spain are leading the tournament in distance covered in possession. They’ve run 20km farther than the second-place team. They’re sixth in distance covered when not in possession.
They’re also leading the tournament in shots, solo runs, attacks (from center, right, and left), deliveries in the penalty area (they’ve had 57; the second-place team has 38), passes completed (short, medium, and long), pass completion percentage, crosses, crosses completed, and corners. They’re third in shots on goal, five ahead of Germany and ten ahead of Brazil, and fourth in shots blocked. They’ve been tackled more than any other team in the tournament, have drawn fewer yellow cards than any team except North Korea, and have been offside fewer times than any team to make the quarterfinals.
They’re sixth in goals scored. In short, they’re boring, all right.
Terrific stuff, Alan. You had me at #1.
Total football was a kind of stunning aberration, a brief window into soccer played a deeply different way. But watching Dutch soccer, post-1970, suggests something more — and something different — than that the Dutch of 2010 aren’t the Dutch of Neeskens and Cruyff: For one, Total Football didn’t die at the studded feet of Mark van Bommel. Just ask Jaap Stam, Edgar Davids, or the brothers Koeman. For another, the other teams in 1974 and 1978 all played very differently too. (Check, for example, the 1974 game against Uruguay: La Celeste wander around almost aimlessly in the middle — and slowly too.) So your nos. 1 and 2 are spot-on — and helpful tonics in a sea of misguided nostalgia.
By the way, your mom must be pretty darn fast . . . .
@Brian Phillips I love it when a plan comes together.
@Sparkle Motion! Thanks for the kind words, though to knowledgable folks such as yourself the point is obvious. And yes, Mom can book it.
@Brian Phillips thanks for clarification…
@phil Of course, the other point to be made is that stats don’t really tell you whether a team looks boring or not. But these at least paint a picture of a team that’s been a lot sharper in attack than many people are suggesting.
@phil To Phil & Brian & Alan & Anyone Else –
Apologies of this has been discussed already, but the “stats” discussion makes for a perfect segue: http://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?cntn_id=117231&WT.mc_id=USNSF_1.
I’d love to hear your thoughts.
@Brian Phillips Also, 30th in distance covered per/hour, last in goals scored amongst semifinalists. It looks like they aren’t running around so much mostly because they aren’t. As to why that is? Maybe because they spend so much time in possession they don’t have to. And because nobody is making them.
@Brian Phillips Thanks for the reality check. It’s amazing how a framing, e.g. “Spain plays boring football”, becomes treated as a truth. This is especially frustrating since “boring” is an aesthetic and personal assessment. Personally I prefer Spain’s style of football to Mourinho’s style, which seems to be collecting alcolytes.
The Dutch are victims of this kind of framing. They are being treated as undeserving of their wins, because somehow their play does not fit the punditocracy narrative. The triumph of this final will be the actual play over hypothesized football philosophies, regardless of who wins.
@Sparkle Motion! I came this close to writing about that before the World Cup started, but changed my mind when I saw that it only considered Euro 2008, which seemed like too small a sample set to be very conclusive. Since the tournament started, I haven’t had a chance to delve into it. Does it look useful? I’ve watched every Spain game with the thought that I should try to figure out whether Sergio Ramos is underrated (they say he was as good as Xavi at Euro 2008), but I have yet to figure out whether Sergio Ramos is underrated.
The full paper is here.
The only thing I take exception with is that Sneijder is lucky. He’s won a trophy pretty much every year he’s been playing and this year he won the treble at Inter. He’s also managed to get wins for Holland and pull them into a World Cup final game. If he’s “lucky” it’s lasted him his whole life practically.
@phil Where did you find that stat?
@Tim Sneijder is a great player, one of the best in the world. I just mean that some of his goals in this tournament have benefitted from the gracious benevolence of the goddess Fortuna.
@Brian Phillips http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/statistics/teams/distance.html Isn’t that where you were getting yours?
@Brian Phillips hah i don’t think that stat means what I thought i means.
Great article. While many focus on Spain’s possession and short passing game, I think the thing that gets overlooked and what truly makes them great is their back line. Not only are Puyol and Pique two of the best centerbacks in the world, but they know each other so well from playing together week in and week out. Ramos is probably the best right back in the world after Maicon, and although Capdevila isn’t as offensive, he is damn solid at the back. Germany (even without Muller) could barely even get scoring chances against them, so I don’t see Holland being able to break through. They could get 1 but more than that will be very difficult.
@phil I don’t think so either — although it’s true that their top speed is really low.
@Brian Phillips The style doesn’t call for much sprinting — it’s move-to-open-space, receive-pass, pass-to-open-teammate, move-to-open-space, rinse and repeat. Ten yards at a time. WBE Jerry (third comment above) is right to say that the teams that let them do this are writing the same script for failure repeatedly. Chile lost to Spain, yes, but by pressing them they (a) got at least a little more possession for themselves and (b) forced Spain into higher tempo and more activity. If a team with more attacking talent than Chile tries the same, things could get interesting. Thus my (highly tentative, but don’t tell anyone) prediction.
@Alan Jacobs Yes, true, and I thought in the Chile game that Spain looked like they weren’t used to being defended that aggressively and weren’t quite sure what to do about it. If the Dutch try the same tactic, it’s going to be an interesting game.
Though if van Bommel kills Xavi, I won’t be held responsible for anything I do.
@Brian Phillips Though if van Bommel kills Xavi, I won’t be held responsible for anything I do.
Well, if he fails, if won’t be for lack of trying. And I have a feeling that if Xavi is still on his feet at the end of the match van Bommel will self-immolate at midfield (just like the cassette tapes used to on the original Mission, Impossible).
@Brian Phillips if? If? Do Van Bommel and De Jong know how to play any other way? I’m expecting a very chippy opening half hour before things calm down and Xavi ten foot passes me to sleep, like a melodic lullaby to a child with a full stomach.
Excellent point, in all seriousness, about Xavi’s distance covered in relation to passes completed – he really has impressive stamina which is a precondition to his excellent passing and decisions
I see Dutch losing their collective tempers in 79th minute of exhausting, but mesmerizing tiki taka and Van Bommel goes rogue on Xavi and cleats up, gets a….red card…Spain score one because the Dutch are still angry, Dutch score one because Sneijder is get angry and then Spain score another just for fun, and we all have EKG’s and it turns out we didn’t have heart attacks, we were only holding our breaths.
Great list, but hasn’t the Truth in No. 5 always been self-evident? As much as I love him, crediting it exclusively to J. Wilson regarding this WC may be a stretch.
And just so my vote counts – I love Spain and their liquid triangles. Try cuing up the classic debut GZA album to accompany their flow of play. Both too hypnotic.
Spain: so perfect or soporific?
@bahns asn’t the Truth in No. 5 always been self-evident?
It certainly ought to be, but I think some commentators tend to forget it. “You can’t beat a 4-2-3-1 playing a 4-4-2!” — Well, in general there’s a problem, yes, but it really depends on how you play your 4-4-2, on the kinds of positional adjustments your players make on the fly. So I thought Wilson’s statement was a good reminder.
@bahns Sorry to un-aspirate your “h” in that quote.
@Brian Phillips Thanks for that. Spain shocked Germany by launching such a direct corner. I thought it would be harmless, and they would continue to massage the ball towards goal. Both Barcelona and Spain have been impressive in how high up the pitch that they press.
I am also sick and tired listening to people that praise this passing game. If it was Italy doing it and winning by 1:0, everyone would be saying what a boring soccer, but because it is Spain, it is wonderful.
I wish Ruud Gullit would go away. Walked out on them in 1994. The last manager of Chelsea before they became good. Couldn’t make it in MLS, where you actually do have to coach and improve the players.
You need some spanish opinion, and here I am
It is possible that your prediction is rigth, Dutch can get goal first and then Spain will have a lot of problems and they will get to many risks, but you forgot that Spain leave few chanches to get goal to their enemies (including German). It is probably that Dutch get one or two chances in the first 45 minutes, but nor more. And believe me, I see Robben in Madrid, he is not the best forward to get goal, it is not Van Nistelrooy, he can fail five times easily in a bad day.
About the “boring” spain, ok, tiki-taka it is boring many times, but
Is it more boring than Brasil with six people in defense and long pass every time?
Is it mor boring than Argentina that dont play in middle and only try to send ball to Tevez and press over it?
You forget other issue, Dutch are not ready to wait without ball and defense itself 60 minutes on a match, for offense teams it is a terrible situation, the players lost position and faith in 30 minutes and start to run too much. If Spain get ball on the fist half hour Dutch start to be worst team each minute. I see it on Barcelona-Madrid matchs, when Madrid lost possesion for 30 minutes they lost confidence and star to run every player individually, then there is no match, only get minutes until rival gets goal.
I thought the idea of football was passing and moving. Anything else IS anti-football. But to play football properly, you need alot. And expect more than eleven players to deliver alot. The total football concept hasn’t been tried again because it’s hard to employ. Most probably, because players don’t stay in the same club for as much time as they used to. I think the lack of total football is to do with the Bosman ruling rather than anything else. It was the ruling which disbanded the last of Ajax’s total football in 95. Also, total football got nothing to do with formations. You could have a 541 playing totality for the proletariats if you wish. It’s about all players giving the same amount of attention to attack and defence. Inter played two of them last season: Eto’o and Sneijder; and the world suddenly saw a new system, when in fact, it was two total-footballers making the difference for a cattenaccio-bent side (OK, Maicon was there, too, and I guess the cocktail is a new thing, fair enuff). That’s at least 8 more players to totalise, but, hey, the team will probably disband and who is going to understand where partners are gonna run it for the empty space? From Dinamo Kiev to Ajax, total football has been played by CCCP and Netherlands because their bones were from a single club. The pragmatic part is in the $$$, not the ‘modern’ approach. Total football was/is the modern development (or it’s first step). The post-modern bit is still looking for shape, not necessarily 4231 (as Korea DPR coach would love to prove if only he could get his hands on some players). It’s lost in champions league money and since Barca is so indebted, the team that was to take a different variant of modern football (which Spain has about created in the last 3-4 years together with Barca) might dissapear with it soon to send us back towards apemanship. Unless Germany comes to the rescue. Oh, how times have changed
Alan, regarding no 13, what happened after you woke up?
) Seriously now, Spain has the best defensive game in the world and one of the best offensive games, at this WC they really missed a lot of chances that they shouldn’t have but if Torres would have been in form, things could have been different. Spain’s style is appealling to me, I don’t know why fluid passes wouldn’t be, this type of game usually brings them a lot of goal opportunities. I can’t understand how Zizi cand compare Italy’s 1-0 wins with Spain’s 1-0 wins, it’s like comparing an Lamborghini with a truck, they’re both vehicles but the similarities stop there. I think Spain will win with 2-1, it will be very hard for the Dutch to score more than once at the way Spain has played so far. And also Netherlands received minimum 1 goal per match in the knock-out phases, don’t see them leaving the field with less than 2 goals received.
@dmitri
Don’t believe everything you read, there was a temporary problem with liquidities at Barca but they are very strong financially, they have a 100 million euro transfers budget
BTW, Brazil and Netherlands, the supposed ‘pragmatists,’ have been possessive of the ball just as well, and Gilberto Silva runs a marathon too. Germans are less (except for Schweini, Khedira and Lahm). The closest to Inter’s 35% are Japan and Uruguay, and Rubin Kazan. For comparison’s sake. Van Maarwijk isn’t as pragmatic as one would believe from how he beat Uruguay. It’s all in Sneijder’s deflection (as oppose to the free-standing Van Persie, at the time), and the rare Robben header. Out of the blue scenarios that are, let’s face it, individualist’s flair spawning from constant possession. Should we now incorporate possession as part of pragmatism, or should we seperate them? Ask Okada for sincere advice
@dmitri
The Bosman ruling has changed the game. For many(most?) fans for the better: the people in England, Spain, Germany and Italy get to see fantastic football every week. In Holland, the opposite has taken place. Due to the reputation of the Dutch national team, Dutch attackers and midfielders are overvalued (like those from Brazil) on the European market, and as a result any Dutch kid with a modicum of talent is snapped up by clubs from the big four leagues before they have even broken through in the Dutch league.
Once admired Ajax has become a joke, still trying to play like Barcelona but on the budget of Watford, they haven’t been able to win the league in six years. Hardly able to afford overvalued Dutch players or make money on transfers any more, it probably won’t be training the next generation of Orange players. It looks like Wesley Sneijder may turn out to be the final prize crop of the formerly hugely successful Ajax academy.
This world cup is probably the final chance for Holland to win the cup. The next generation is either sitting on the bench in the Spanish or English 2nd division or failing to develop their talents playing against even lower skilled teams in the Dutch league.
@dmitri Barça isn’t that indebted. It’s Rosell making a fuss so he can get UNICEF off the shirts and a money-paying sponsor on, thus achieving one more step towards his goal of milking Barça for every penny he can get.
@Alan Jacobs Thank you for this wonderful article (although I do hope your prediction ends up wrong), especially #s 1 and 2. Total Football existed for a brief period of time in the 70s, which, yes, included two spectacular WC finals losses by the Dutch, something they’ve never gotten over. But nothing since then has been Total Football, no matter how much various styles have owed to the Total Football legacy. It completely baffles me how people are calling the current Barcelona/Spain style Total Football, given that in a real sense they are complete opposites: the essence of Total Football was dynamic positioning, in that the players, within limits, were expected to change positions with each other as the pace of the game dictated. The current Barça/Spain style is instead based heavily on the idea that it is the ball that is dynamic, but positions are static. The only players who routinely interchange positions are the forward three — the midfield, the most fluid of regions in Total Football, is the most zonal for Spain. The current style owes at least as much to Arrigo Sacchi’s concept of “the best defence is an organized everything” as it does to Michels’ and Cruyff’s concepts of ball-worship and exploitation of space.
@ZZ I think on this blog at least, if Italy or anyone played like this they would be lauded. I’ve never seen another international team play this way.
@John Spain scored only 7 (seven) goals in 6 games. Even Greece scored 7 goals in 6 games in EURO 2004, and I did not hear people praising them. The lowest total for goals scored by the world cup winner is 11. I do not like the way they play in South Africa, and they played much more attractive soccer during EURO 2008.
@Salman Thaw
Mourinho is friggin’ virus and he’s killing football. In a few years you’ll see… How can anyone who loves football praise someone who clearly hates it?!
It’s obvious nobody plays totaalvoetbal anymore. But no elftal prior to this one has denied/offended/forgot/badmouthed so much totaalvoetbal and holland’s football history as this one. No one wants these guys to play totaalvoetbal! But we want them to play like they did two years ago! Do you still remember? The team was basically the same, and yet… These guys are being cynical, liars, quacks. And that makes everybody who loves football sad. Especially those who love football and… Holland.
Hup Holland Hup!
La Naranja will crush La Roja!
Over on SI, Ben Lyttleton has a great look at the same issues of Dutch style, and Dutch anxiety about their style, that I touched on in my Slate piece. There’s a fantastic quote by David Winner at the end.
@Angharad & Evan: oh, at least Barca is actually in better condition. Cheers for that!
@Sjors: So sad to hear that. Spartak had defeated Ajax in UEFA Cup ’98 if I correctly remember, and they’re nothing close to the legendary 95 youth. We were excited to face them, but they were no match, a sad victory. It’s an insult to the great teams, and to those who put serious effort to challenge these greats. Spartak 95/96 also dissolved within months, but I understand our dodgy undertable deals and the slagging russian economy, but then Europe is not troubled. I feel sad for those who are happy with this Bosman ruling because it’s not the same quality. Here’s what I think: sports marketers don’t know yet how to sell quality products (example: CRon). Thank God we have Barca and the German league’s making smart investments. Fingers crossed.
Oh, a link from that 98 match http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpHuBnz2sOs
))
@ZZ You didn’t really reply to my point. I said ” if anyone else played this way” as in style of play not how many goals scored. You can’t possibly be saying that Greece 04 and Spain 10 play similar football, can you?
I’ve never seen an international team play like Spain. I admire their style but I’m quite ok with people not enjoying it. I think their lack of goals has just been lack of luck. They really should have had 3 against Germany before their goal for example. If they score early against Holland, they might go to town.
Robben will not score. He is a one-trick pony: he’ll get the ball on the wing, then touch the ball a gazillion times with his left foot towards the middle, then either shoot the ball (and hit a defender) OR if he’s closely guarded, flop and writhe on the ground.
I enjoy Spain’s tiki-taka. So what if it takes them forever to score? When they do, it’s a wonderful payoff.
Spain 1:0 Netherlands
As much as I love the Dutch, and my god I do (I mean they wear Orange jerseys! Orange), I have this horribly overwhelming feeling, which has nothing to do with Paul, that Spain will nick it, with the most boring yet pure performance of football I will have ever seen. They, as you said, will hold onto it and hold onto it and hold onto it, until Van Bommel goes and slams Xavi in the face. Then they’ll score. And then everybody will write long articles about how ‘this’ is football at its best. Unfortunately football at its best is worse than golf. It’s like croquet.
I hope Robben goes and does what he hasn’t all World Cup and actually takes that easier shot when he cuts in once, instead of trying to dribble past the stewards and the corner flag and the goal post. I hope one of Sneijder’s back passes catches the wind and flies into the Spanish goal (which isn’t that unlikely) and I hope Van Persie actually doesn’t scuffle one.
I hope, but sadly in vain.
@dmitri I don’t blame the Bosman ruling as much as refusal to adapt to the new circumstances. Of course, the sudden collapse of Ajax after 1995 was directly caused by the fact that most of their star line up left the following years without a transfer fee, but they’ve had a decade and a half to adapt and change their tactics. They’re refusing to, and still try to party like it’s 1995, which is embarrassing considering the quality of the players they can afford these days. Objectively, the star players make more people happy by playing in the Premier League (100 million fans world wide?) than in Holland (perhaps 10 million fans and that’s stretching it). Complaining about it is like complaining that it’s not fair that one is not tall enough to play basket ball.
What I do blame the Bosman ruling for is the fact that slowly European football is becoming all the same. You used to see teams from Italy with highly organised defending, from Germany with great athletic skill and a winner mentality, from Ukraine and Russia came high paced counter football, from England came intense and aggressive high tempo football, teams from Holland played on positioning and ball possession. Today they’re all more and more the same (except Ajax, which clings to its obsolete ideals), and the results between two clubs become almost as predictable as comparing the budgets.
I reaaly cand’t understand how anyine can compare Italy and Greece with Spain. You can only do that if you just saw the results and not the matches. Italy and Greece score a goal and then they defend with the whole team in thei own half. At this WC, Spain had a lot of chances but Torres, Villa and Pedro missed great chances (mainly Torres). If the spaniards would have scored a goal for every 2 chances, they would have scored the same number of goals as Germany. Nobody has to like their style of play but please, don’t bring silly arguments like “they play the same like Italy” just because they missed a lot of chances. Germany – Spain was one of the most beautiful matches at this WC and a demonstration of footbal from the spaniards, it doesn’t matter that there was only one goal scored.
@Sjors, the loss of national characteristic is fine by me so long as the efforts to produce football in quality terms take place – which is obviously produces certain characters. Bosman ruling isn’t the problem. Barca being the only quality on offer is. It’s a waste of potential, not only in terms of talent, but also revenue. I know it sounds politically incorrect, but there should be some regulation in place. We’re letting low class investors rake in quick profits while the likes of Abramovic gets second grade football
Que o site deveria ser traduzido para o português, pois é muito bom. This website could be translate for portuguese, because it´s amazing.