For a whole year he was my favorite player in football. I loved his hesitations and would make comparisons to Thelonious Monk while he gathered himself over the ball and hovered over it, probingly, like a hummingbird, knowing exactly when to dart. Untouched by the smallest worry over anyone else’s intention, for mentally he was always ten seconds in the future and patient because so quick, he would count beats, drag the ball aside as if it were a remote control for moving the defender, then lean suddenly and sling it past him, laying out the centerback with a well-meaning, almost floral display of contempt. The furthest thing from his mind was the thought of causing hard feelings. If he left you on the ground it was simply in the enjoyment of his own exquisiteness.
There was a Fredric March- or Cary Grant-like quality about him, too, of simultaneously making the joke and being above the joke, in some way trivializing what was serious in him by going over so wholly into pure delicacy and excess, in some other way using it like a filter to reveal a kind of actual perfection. He was like the violins in Mozart, commanding through happiness. And he was commanding, too, proving it never more than in the moment after a goal, when, in the instant when most players give themselves up to abandon, he would remember everything that had happened and turn to whatever other player had contributed, not wildly but with a surveying impressiveness, and point as if to say, you and I are feeling about this what I mean for us to be feeling about this. Sometimes he would do that to the crowd itself. And they would be.
It was his shivering angle, the way he came in like a cutting blade of heraldry, all the colors floating on the pitch somehow instrumental and supplementary to the authority of his own, that made his lightness so thrilling. He wasted nothing and, shoulders high like a vulture’s or like the mounds in the shaman’s cloak, would score unspectacularly when he could, some principle of conservation making him glide from despising friction. He was too fine for it, and like lightning he overturned the hierarchy that makes brawn and earthiness stronger than jovial air.
Nevertheless there was some final wickedness missing in him, some necessary murderous underlayer that means having threatened the world with a thunderbolt you will err on the side of releasing it. There was a sense, desperately subtle but increasingly the main thing, that he had to be talked into his destructions, not out of them. That having achieved everything he wanted in life he thought he would be loved for it and would remain unquestionable forever, rather than being subject to whatever interrogations it was the world’s pleasure to throw at him. And somehow, a disappointment crept into his game that seemed a loss of illusions as much as abilities.
At Barcelona, you can see him playing up to it, trying to hustle and bounce his way back into that keenness of sheer grace. Which, of course, can probably never be recaptured. Having done that once—slanting on the ball, tiptoeing on it, soft-footing to the side in his kit and bright colors—and looked away from it, all he can play for now is a repetition, when at his best he was sharp enough to play for a continuance.
Read More: Portraits, Thierry Henry
by Brian Phillips · January 6, 2009
Beautifully done, as always. Some — not all, but some — of what you say in the penultimate paragraph could be said of Dennis Bergkamp as well. The difference, I think, is that Bergkamp was more accepting of his own emotional limitations than Henry. How odd that they would both play for the same team.
Yes. Sometimes he seems above football, as if it is too common for him. Or it isn’t enough.
Gave me chills.
Great post. Its a shame Barca had such a dreary year last year – he seemed to be the only one to bring a real powerful attacking edge to the team.
This year – although he is not in the starting XI all the time, he has been a useful and effective attacking option as always.
Wonderful write-up, Brian. You’ve put into words the seemingly undefinable essence of Thierry Henry’s grace and above-the-game demeanor. A great article for a great player.
Lovely piece. As a Barsa fan, I’ve gone from frustrated that Henryisn’t the player he was, to respectful of him as a good-not-great attacking option. He still cuts a graceful figure out on the pitch, though. If you’re into grace, you should check out Toure Yaya. Long, languid, and seemingly keeping a rhythm that’s a bit different than everyone else’s.
Check him out: http://nomoreonionbags.com/blog/?p=85
I liked, in ‘hummingbird’, the ghost of his friend Steve Nash.
This is fantastic, as ever.
That’s a great call, Greg. I wonder if he feels like he’s “trapped inside a sandwich bag” out on the left wing.
I feel like someone approaching a tea party with a mind to throw a turd amongst the sandwiches but for all Henry’s skill, smarts and moxie on the pitch he always struck me as the most vain, arrogant and graceless tit in the premiership (a title not easily claimed)
Beautifully written. I wish i could have seen him play when he was at Arsenal. Your description is one of a magic player in the beautiful game at its finest.
Thierry Henry was my favourite played for the longest time.
In the premier league, he seemed to be a rapier amongst the broadswords.
I fuzzily recall hearing somewhere David Gilmour of Pink Floyd saying that you have to be arrogant to produce something so good. I think this applies to Henry. I forgave him his aloofness as long as he supplied such magic.
I think somewhere along the way he started caring too much.