Not since the squirming, slippery ancestors of the creatures who would one day be football agents first hauled themselves out of the sea have Chelsea lost a match at Stamford Bridge. Not until today, when Liverpool took advantage of a random deflection in the box to sneak out of London with a 1-0 win.
It wasn’t dramatic. It wasn’t even semidramatic. Had there not been a record older than the invention of cuneiform writing by the early Sumerians on the line—also the small matter of first place in the Premier League table—you might have been tempted to take a look at what Harry Redknapp was doing at White Hart Lane (winning, so far, courtesy of Pavlyuchenko). The live report of the match would look like this:
0-9min Nothing
10min Xabi Alonso’s speculative shot dings off Bosingwa at the last second, taking it in the opposite direction of Peter Čech’s routine dive. 1-0 to the Club That Have Won Considerably More Than You.
11-90min Liverpool defend with a commitment to inertia that would please Barack Obama, José Mourinho, and Isaac Newton in roughly equal amounts.
But there it is. Phil Scolari now has a worse home record at Chelsea than Avram Grant…and he always will. It’ll be portrayed as Liverpool throwing down the title gauntlet, and maybe that’s what they did. They didn’t look all that impressive. But taken in a general sense, the road to the championship runs right through José Bosingwa’s shoulder, and if luck has decided to be with Liverpool this season, Chelsea’s home record won’t be the only ancient precedent to be overturned between now and the end of May.
Read More: Chelsea, Liverpool, The Occasional Match Summary
by Brian Phillips · October 26, 2008
Hull in third, Redknapp at Tottenham, LFC top of the table. That collider is doing wonders.
I love jammy goals against Chelsea. LOVE THEM.
“Defend with a commitment to inertia”? Rubbish. It was a game with a lot of ebb and flow and both sides tried to attack in the second half. I don’t know what game you were watching.
The game in which Chelsea had 61% of the possession and yet managed only two shots on goal.
I have got to semi-agree with Maverick here. I can’t seem to find the statistic to back it up, but I think possession by each half would reflect a different ort of game than possession for the entire ninety minutes. I get the feeling that 60-40 is divided more along the lines of 70-30 in the first half and 50-50 in the second half. there is truth in what you say about Liverpool defending with commitment, but in the second half the look more likely to get a second than Chelsea did to get an equalizer.
Just my two cents, won’t buy you much though.